Insurance News

IRDAI's Insurance Rules Proposal Draws Halan's Warning on Profits: What Policyholders Should Check

Livemint reports Monika Halan saying profits built on policyholders' suffering are bad for the country, as IRDAI proposes new insurance rules. Here is what buyers should check before the rules settle.

Written by BankCreds Editorial Team

Reviewed by BankCreds Financial Experts

Published:

Updated:

IRDAI's Insurance Rules Proposal Draws Halan's Warning on Profits: What Policyholders Should Check

Livemint has reported that Monika Halan, a prominent voice on household finance, said profits built on the tears of policyholders are bad for the country. The comment came as IRDAI, the insurance regulator, put forward a new set of insurance rules. For policyholders, the message is that the balance between insurer profit and customer protection is being debated in public, and it is worth checking your own policies now.

The full text of the proposal and the exact points Halan raised are in the original Livemint report. This article does not attempt to reproduce them. What we can do is explain how insurance regulation in India works, why the tension between profit and claim fairness keeps coming back, and what an ordinary buyer of health, term or motor cover can do without waiting for the final rules.

The practical rule is simple: a proposal is not a law. Nothing in your existing policy changes until the regulator finalises and notifies rules, and even then existing contracts usually follow their own terms. Use this window to understand what you have bought.

Key takeaways

  • According to reporting by Livemint, Monika Halan said profits built on policyholders' suffering are bad for the country, in the context of IRDAI's new insurance rules proposal.
  • A proposal is not yet a rule. Your current policy terms stay as written until the regulator notifies final norms.
  • The heart of the debate is how easily claims are paid, how clearly products are sold and how fairly customers are treated when things go wrong.
  • Claim friction has a real rupee cost, because families bridge delays with savings or loans.
  • The best response this week is a policy audit: waiting periods, exclusions, co-pay, disclosure and claim deadlines.

What the IRDAI insurance rules proposal and Halan's comment are about

As reported by Livemint, IRDAI has floated new insurance rules for consultation, and Halan reacted by saying that profit earned at the cost of policyholders' pain does not serve the country. We only know the headline framing, so we will not guess at clause-level detail such as specific caps, timelines or penalties.

What the comment tells us is the lens through which one influential commentator is reading the proposal. The lens is customer outcomes: are claims paid, are products explained honestly, and does the system reward insurers for serving policyholders or for avoiding them. That is the same lens a household should use on its own policy.

Regulatory proposals in India typically go through a public comment stage before anything is notified. Insurers, consumer groups, distributors and individual experts submit views, and the final version can differ from the draft. That is why reading the source coverage and watching the regulator's own announcements matters more than reacting to a headline.

How insurance regulation in India works today

IRDAI licenses insurers and intermediaries and issues regulations on product filing, disclosure, claims handling and policyholder protection. Some protections are already well known to buyers, and you should confirm the current version for your own product on the regulator's site.

Under current norms, health policies have a moratorium period after which claims cannot be contested on grounds of non-disclosure except fraud. Waiting periods for pre-existing conditions have been shortened in recent years. New policies generally come with a free-look period, during which you can return the policy if you disagree with its terms. Customers can also escalate unresolved complaints to the insurer's grievance officer and then to the Insurance Ombudsman.

These are the standing mechanics of the system, not details of the new proposal. They show where regulation typically bites: at the moment of sale, at the moment of claim and at the moment of dispute.

Protection point What it governs Typical standing position (verify for your policy)
Free-look period Time to return a new policy About 30 days for most new policies
Waiting period, pre-existing disease Delay before related claims are covered Up to 3 years in many health plans
Moratorium in health cover Period after which claims are hard to contest 60 months of continuous cover
Grievance route Where to complain Insurer, then Insurance Ombudsman
Disclosure at proposal What you must tell the insurer Material facts such as health, habits and income

The numbers in the table are standing background and can differ by product and by the date the policy was issued. Always check the policy wording.

Why profit versus policyholder fairness keeps coming up

Insurance is a promise sold today and tested years later. That timing gap creates a built-in conflict. The insurer collects premium upfront and books profit when claims are lower than expected. A policyholder only finds out how good the product is when a claim arrives, often during a family crisis.

That is why consumer advocates focus on conduct. A low claim ratio can mean healthy underwriting, or it can mean strict rejection. A high renewal rate can mean satisfied customers, or it can mean customers who cannot leave because of age and pre-existing conditions. The headline number rarely tells you which.

Halan's remark, as reported, fits into this long-running argument. It does not accuse any named insurer, at least not in the headline, and we do not suggest any. It says the system should not treat policyholder distress as an acceptable source of profit.

What could change for policyholders

Because we only know the headline, we cannot promise specific changes. We can describe the areas where insurance rules generally affect ordinary buyers, and which you should watch when the full proposal is discussed:

  1. Selling practices. Clearer explanations, fewer mis-sold products, and better records of what the agent told you.
  2. Claims handling. Timelines for decisions, reasons for rejection and the right to appeal.
  3. Product design. Fewer confusing exclusions, sub-limits and co-payments hidden in the fine print.
  4. Surrender and lapse terms. How much you get back if you exit a savings-linked policy early.
  5. Grievance redressal. How fast complaints are resolved and who is accountable.

If the final rules improve any of these, the benefit will flow mostly to people who do not read policies closely. If they do not, the reasoning below still helps you protect yourself.

A worked example: what a disputed claim costs a household

Consider a family with a Rs 10 lakh health cover. A parent is hospitalised and the bill comes to Rs 4 lakh. The policy has a 10 percent co-payment, so the family owes Rs 40,000 even if the claim is accepted in full. The insurer pays Rs 3.6 lakh.

Now suppose the insurer disputes the claim for several months. The family needs Rs 4 lakh immediately. If they borrow through a personal loan at 14 percent for one year, the interest is about Rs 56,000 on the full amount, though a shorter repayment reduces it. Compare the options:

Scenario Insurer pays Family pays Extra cost
Claim accepted in full, cashless Rs 3,60,000 Rs 40,000 co-pay None beyond co-pay
Claim accepted after a delay, family bridges with a loan Rs 3,60,000 later Rs 40,000 plus interest Roughly Rs 30,000 to Rs 56,000 interest depending on tenure
Claim rejected Rs 0 Rs 4,00,000 Full bill plus any borrowing cost

The figures are illustrative arithmetic, not from the Livemint report. They show why claim conduct matters more than the small differences in premium between plans. If you ever need to bridge a gap, compare options in our personal loan guides and use the EMI calculator to see the real cost before you borrow.

What to do now: a policy audit checklist

You do not need to wait for the final rules. Spend an hour on each policy you hold:

  • Find the policy schedule and note the sum insured, co-pay, room-rent limit and sub-limits.
  • List the waiting periods and exclusions in plain words.
  • Confirm that every disclosure in your proposal form, such as health conditions, smoking and income, was accurate.
  • Keep a copy of the proposal form and any email from the agent describing the product.
  • Save the insurer's cashless helpline and claim-intimation deadline on your phone.
  • Make sure the nominee's contact details are current.
  • Note the free-look window if you bought a policy recently and you are unhappy with it.

For updates as the story develops, check our news hub and the regulator's own announcements.

Common mistakes to avoid

The first mistake is treating a headline as a rule change. A criticism from an expert, or a draft from a regulator, does not alter your contract. Cancelling a policy in response can leave you uninsured, and a new policy will restart waiting periods.

The second is under-disclosing at the time of purchase. Hiding a condition to keep the premium low is the classic route to a disputed claim. Tell the truth, pay the slightly higher premium and keep the proof.

The third is buying insurance as an investment without checking the returns. Savings-linked policies can have low effective returns and heavy early-exit costs. Ask for the surrender value in writing.

The fourth is ignoring the policy after purchase. Renewal dates, changed terms and premium increases can pass unnoticed. Set a reminder a month before each renewal.

Outlook: what to expect from here

Proposals of this kind usually invite comments, and final rules follow after review. Expect insurers to argue that tighter conduct rules raise costs, and consumer advocates to argue that protection is the whole point of the product. The outcome will likely sit somewhere between the two.

What will not change is your own responsibility. Whatever the final rules say, the buyer who understands exclusions, discloses honestly and keeps records is in the strongest position on the day a claim is filed.

Frequently asked questions

What did Monika Halan say about IRDAI's new insurance rules proposal?

According to reporting by Livemint, Halan said that profits built on the tears of policyholders are bad for the country. The comment was made in the context of IRDAI's proposal of new insurance rules. Read the original report for her full remarks.

Do IRDAI's proposed rules change my existing policy right away?

No. A proposal is only a draft and does not alter your existing contract. Final rules take effect only after the regulator notifies them, and your policy documents remain the reference for your current terms.

Should I cancel or switch my insurance policy because of this news?

Not on the strength of a headline. Switching can restart waiting periods and may leave you without cover during a gap. Audit your policy first and switch only if a better product genuinely fits your needs.

What can I do if my insurance claim is rejected or delayed?

Start with the insurer's grievance officer, keeping written records of every communication. If the response is unsatisfactory, you can approach the Insurance Ombudsman, which is a free route for eligible disputes. Keep the policy schedule, proposal form and hospital or claim documents ready.

Where can I follow official updates on insurance rules?

The regulator publishes its notifications and consultation papers on its website. You can also follow our news hub for coverage as the story develops.

BankCreds analysis

The headline is a statement about principle, and principles do not change your premium or your claim this week. As reported by Livemint, the proposal is still a proposal, and we do not know from the headline which rules are on the table or how far they go. Anyone who changes an existing policy in reaction to it is acting on very little.

The practical stakes still show up in rupees. Take a 35-year-old buying a Rs 1 crore term plan at roughly Rs 15,000 a year. Over 20 years that is Rs 3 lakh in premiums, and the family's whole protection depends on one event: a claim being paid in full. If a dispute over an old health disclosure delays that payout by a year, the household has to bridge the gap from savings or a loan. A personal loan at 12 to 16 percent on Rs 10 lakh costs roughly Rs 1.2 to 1.6 lakh a year in interest alone. Claim friction is therefore a cost even when the claim is eventually paid, and rules that reduce it matter far more than rules that trim a premium by a few hundred rupees.

Who gains and who loses

Buyers who read their policies carefully gain least, because they already avoid the traps. Buyers who rely on an agent's verbal assurance gain most from any tightening of disclosure, selling and claims norms. Insurers whose margins depend on high lapse rates and narrow claims practice lose most. Insurers that already settle claims cleanly lose little.

What not to over-read

A critical remark from a well-known consumer-finance voice is not a rule, and a proposal is not an enforced regulation. It does not mean insurers are about to pay more claims tomorrow, and it does not justify cancelling a policy you need. The one change worth making this week is free: read your own policy schedule and note the exclusions, waiting periods and claim-intimation deadline, so you know where a dispute would start.

This section is BankCreds' own assessment of what the development means for Indian borrowers and savers. It is independent commentary, not part of the source reporting above.

Sources & references

  1. Livemint — originating report https://www.livemint.com/insurance/monika-halan-hails-irdai-reforms-feel-insurance-industry-will-not-do-anything-no-hard-deadline-delay-customer-protection-11790441816996.html
  2. IRDAI — Insurance regulator that issues policyholder-protection and product rules https://irdai.gov.in/

Source links are shown as plain text, not clickable links. Copy a URL into your browser to read the original report.

Editorial note & disclaimer

How this was reported. The development above is attributed to the source or sources listed. BankCreds does not independently verify a third party's reporting; where a figure or a regulatory position is stated as fact, it is either attributed or drawn from the regulator's own published material. Everything under "BankCreds analysis" is our own assessment.

Rates and figures. Interest rates, per-gram values and premium bands quoted here are indicative, move daily, and differ by borrower profile, city and lender policy. Confirm the final number with the institution before you act on it — the sanction letter or policy schedule governs, not a news report.

Not financial advice. This article is general information for an Indian audience. It is not investment, tax, credit or insurance advice, takes no account of your circumstances, and BankCreds is not a lender, broker, distributor or advisor. Consider speaking to a SEBI-registered investment adviser or a qualified professional before acting.

Editorial policy · Fact-checking policy · Corrections policy · Our authors · About BankCreds · Contact us

Spotted an error? Corrections are published, not quietly edited — write to us via the contact page and see our corrections policy.

Never miss a rate move — get free alerts

Choose what you care about — every category, one loan type, or a daily gold-rate alert — and we deliver it to your inbox or phone.

Free forever, unsubscribe anytime. We only send what you pick — no spam, no sharing of your contact details.

Disclaimer: BankCreds.com is a loan comparison platform and does not directly lend, disburse, or provide any financial products. We aggregate and display loan offers from RBI-registered banks and NBFCs to help you make an informed decision. All loan applications are processed directly by the respective lender. Interest rates, charges, eligibility, and terms shown are indicative and subject to the lender's final assessment. Please read the lender's terms and conditions carefully before applying.